On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:50:43 +0200
Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820_32.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ struct resource code_resource = {
> .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_MEM
> };
>
> +struct resource bss_resource = {
> + .name = "Kernel bss",
> + .start = 0,
> + .end = 0,
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_MEM
> +};
> +
> static struct resource system_rom_resource = {
> .name = "System ROM",
> .start = 0xf0000,
> @@ -287,6 +294,7 @@ legacy_init_iomem_resources(struct resou
> */
> request_resource(res, code_resource);
> request_resource(res, data_resource);
> + request_resource(res, &bss_resource);
Looks ungainly, doesn't it? Perhaps we should add a third arg to
legacy_init_iomem_resources(), or change legacy_init_iomem_resources() to
take zero args?
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
