** Description changed:
* Explain the bug(s)
We run a simple CPU-only xor application.
+ test.c
+ ------
int main(void) {
long i;
int count = 0;
for (i=0; i< 10000000000; i++) {
count = count ^ i;
}
return 0;
}
tested on BlueField-2 and found consistent performance degradation.
+
* Performance
install from debian kernel packages:
/auto/sw/integration/bluefield_build/kernels/Ubuntu22.04-kernels/*.deb
+
+ $ gcc test.c; time ./a.out
kernel 5.15.0-1042-bluefield: 39sec
kernel 5.15.0-1043-bluefield (1043): 39sec
kernel 5.15.0-1044-bluefield: 49 sec
kernel 5.15.0-1048-bluefield: 49 sec
* Performance-2
However, If we download the kernel source and compile, then we don't see the
difference
/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.160 (1049): 49sec
/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.160-20576-gba1f73c15047 (1043): 49sec
also test other versions
- bf-1024
- bf-1030
- bf-1044
- bf-1049
+ bf-1024
+ bf-1030
+ bf-1044
+ bf-1049
1024, 1030, 1044, 1049 all shows the same performance, 49 sec
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-bluefield in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075557
Title:
performance degradation on BlueField-2 5.15.0-1044-bluefield
Status in linux-bluefield package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
* Explain the bug(s)
We run a simple CPU-only xor application.
test.c
------
int main(void) {
long i;
int count = 0;
for (i=0; i< 10000000000; i++) {
count = count ^ i;
}
return 0;
}
tested on BlueField-2 and found consistent performance degradation.
* Performance
install from debian kernel packages:
/auto/sw/integration/bluefield_build/kernels/Ubuntu22.04-kernels/*.deb
$ gcc test.c; time ./a.out
kernel 5.15.0-1042-bluefield: 39sec
kernel 5.15.0-1043-bluefield (1043): 39sec
kernel 5.15.0-1044-bluefield: 49 sec
kernel 5.15.0-1048-bluefield: 49 sec
* Performance-2
However, If we download the kernel source and compile, then we don't see the
difference
/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.160 (1049): 49sec
/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.160-20576-gba1f73c15047 (1043): 49sec
also test other versions
bf-1024
bf-1030
bf-1044
bf-1049
1024, 1030, 1044, 1049 all shows the same performance, 49 sec
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-bluefield/+bug/2075557/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
