Public bug reported:

SRU Justification

[Impact]

Microsoft has requested that CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED be enabled. This
option has no discernible runtime impact in the default case. As quoted
from research performed by Colin King, "I ran some synthetic stress-ng
throughput and latency tests with and without CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED on
CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED. I don't see enough variation in the throughput or
latency to warrant any concern about enabling this option. We have quite
a bit of small jitter on the results, but overall the kernel results are
similar enough to make me feel OK to enable this option for Focal."

[Test Case]

Microsoft has tested this option using kernels at
https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~rtg/azure-rt-group-sched-sf00314473/. The
customer requesting this config option verified that it satisfied their
requirements. Microsft also determined that there were no performance
regressions for the default case, i.e., when no RT priority threads were
created.

[Where things could go awry]

Adding options to the scheduler could impact work loads that we have yet
to observe.

[Other Info]

SF: 00314473

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)
         Status: New

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Focal)
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)
         Status: New

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Hirsute)
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)
         Status: New

** Affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Impish)
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)
         Status: New

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: linux-azure (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Focal)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Hirsute)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu Impish)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-azure in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939024

Title:
  linux-azure Enable CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED

Status in linux-azure package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-azure source package in Focal:
  New
Status in linux-azure source package in Hirsute:
  New
Status in linux-azure source package in Impish:
  New

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]

  Microsoft has requested that CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED be enabled. This
  option has no discernible runtime impact in the default case. As
  quoted from research performed by Colin King, "I ran some synthetic
  stress-ng throughput and latency tests with and without
  CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED on CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED. I don't see enough
  variation in the throughput or latency to warrant any concern about
  enabling this option. We have quite a bit of small jitter on the
  results, but overall the kernel results are similar enough to make me
  feel OK to enable this option for Focal."

  [Test Case]

  Microsoft has tested this option using kernels at
  https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~rtg/azure-rt-group-sched-sf00314473/. The
  customer requesting this config option verified that it satisfied
  their requirements. Microsft also determined that there were no
  performance regressions for the default case, i.e., when no RT
  priority threads were created.

  [Where things could go awry]

  Adding options to the scheduler could impact work loads that we have
  yet to observe.

  [Other Info]

  SF: 00314473

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/1939024/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to