This bug is missing log files that will aid in diagnosing the problem.
While running an Ubuntu kernel (not a mainline or third-party kernel)
please enter the following command in a terminal window:
apport-collect 1909647
and then change the status of the bug to 'Confirmed'.
If, due to the nature of the issue you have encountered, you are unable
to run this command, please add a comment stating that fact and change
the bug status to 'Confirmed'.
This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the
Ubuntu Kernel Team.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647
Title:
xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
sub-cases
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
Incomplete
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
Incomplete
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
New
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
Incomplete
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
Incomplete
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
Invalid
Bug description:
There are failed cases in the xfrm_policy.sh test, but the overall result is
PASS
$ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
# selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
# PASS: policy before exception matches
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hresh changes)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh
changes)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
hthresh change in ns3)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh
change in ns3)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change
in ns3)
# FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after
htresh change to normal)
# PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh
change to normal)
# PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to
normal)
# PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
$ echo $?
0
This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the
passed test case after the failed one.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
