There is no power box free this week, but indeed I'm +1 as well. Test results look good as well (I've re-run them just to be extra sure) btw: prep (x86_64) : Pass 20 F/S/N 0/0/0 - RC 0 (15 min 55036 lin) migrate (x86_64) : Pass 288 F/S/N 0/0/0 - RC 0 (60 min 214809 lin) cross (x86_64) : Pass 24 F/S/N 0/1/3 - RC 0 (51 min 47738 lin) misc (x86_64) : Pass 103 F/S/N 0/0/0 - RC 0 (39 min 72305 lin)
prep (s390x) : Pass 20 F/S/N 0/0/0 - RC 0 (14 min 43627 lin) migrate (s390x) : Pass 268 F/S/N 0/5/0 - RC 0 (66 min 161708 lin) cross (s390x) : Pass 19 F/S/N 1/1/2 - RC 1 (47 min 45401 lin) misc (s390x) : Pass 67 F/S/N 0/0/0 - RC 0 (24 min 32119 lin) @Frank - I guess he meant Cornelia being the s390x maintainer who already acked it upstream. Furthermore in bug 1835546 we have the ack from the IBM test Team. I think we are as ready as we can be. Thanky everyone involved! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866866 Title: [FFe] Please accept patches for secure guest feature Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems: New Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in qemu package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in s390-tools package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: The secure guest feature (aka protvirt) affects multiple components (kernel, qemu and s390-tools - see below). While dedicated tickets for the different components exist since quite a while, the code arrived late and/or discussion to get it upstream accepted took longer than expected. (Even if we as of today didn't reached the kernel freeze, I'm already adding kernel to this FFe.) Since this is a very important feature the current IBM Z and LinuxONE family, it's requested to be included into focal, the next LTS release, to become exploitable by long running systems. The code is largely architecture specific. No brand new packages or new upstream version are requested, only the cherry-pick of commits (or PR) - so far everything is 'cherry-pick'-able. kernel: The patch set for the kernel is huge (30+ commits), but has only one common code patch (two files). The arch specific patches landed in between in linux-next, the arch specific one is expected to land there very soon (hours/days from now). The common-code patch ran through several hands and landed in between in Andrew Morton's mmots tree. A pre-screening of the code was done by the kernel team and it looked acceptable. (dedicated kernel ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835531) qemu: The entire code seems to be arch specific. Again a pre-screening of the maintainer lead to the fact that it should be acceptable, too. (dedicated qemu ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835546) s390-tools: The entire tool only exists for the s390x architecture. Hence obviously everything is arch specific on that. (dedicated s390-tools ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834534) Currently work is going on to test this function end to end based on Ubuntu components (means based on our s390-tools, qemu and kernel [focal master-next] trees). On top I applied the patches to the packages as well and did manual test buids. With that a potential regression can be considered as low - and even in case of a regression, it will affect s390x only. The patches are being staged for this feature in: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3970 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1866866/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
