Public bug reported:
The `perf` profiling tool, and a few other tools, are part of the Linux
project. Ubuntu gets them from a package specific to the running kernel
version, and uses wrapper scripts installed as e.g. /usr/bin/perf to
dispatch to the appropriate version for the running kernel. This appears
to involve not only checking the actual kernel version number (e.g.
4.15.0) but also the patch level/build number and flavor that Ubuntu
adds (e.g. 4.15.0-62-generic) if found in the kernel version.
This is perfectly fine on a real system, where Ubuntu's package manager
is actually in control of the kernel. But Ubuntu is also fantastically
popular as a base for Docker images, and in a Docker container you have
to take your lumps and run on whatever kernel version the host happens
to be using, even if the host isn't using an official Ubuntu kernel, or
running Ubuntu at all.
As currently designed, the linux-tools-common wrapper scripts cannot
work reliably in a Docker environment.
When running in my particular Kubernetes environment (where the host is
some kind of Red Hat Enterprise Linux derivative), this problem
manifests as the following exchange:
root@adamnovak-pod:/vg# perf record ls
WARNING: perf not found for kernel 3.10.0
You may need to install the following packages for this specific kernel:
linux-tools-3.10.0
You may also want to install one of the following packages to keep up to date:
linux-tools
root@adamnovak-pod:/vg# apt install linux-tools-3.10.0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package linux-tools-3.10.0
E: Couldn't find any package by glob 'linux-tools-3.10.0'
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'linux-tools-3.10.0'
However, the perf binary I happen to have installed, when I get it to
try to run, at least appears to work, despite the kernel version
mismatch. In larger tests, I've gotten perfectly fine profiling data.
root@adamnovak-pod:/vg# /usr/lib/linux-tools/4.15.0-62-generic/perf record ls
bin deps perf.data scripts
[ perf record: Woken up 2 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.002 MB perf.data (10 samples) ]
root@adamnovak-pod:/vg#
So it is not clear that the level of specificity enforced by the wrapper
scripts is actually necessary.
There are a few potential solutions I can see to this problem:
1. Modify the scripts to treat the lack of the exact right tool version
being installed as a warning instead of an error, and have them select
the closest version to run instead.
2. Create linux-tools-3.10.0 ish through linux-tools-5.x.x packages,
containing builds of perf and co. derived from those official mainline
kernels, and a metapackage to install all of them. Then the package that
you get prompted to install when running in a container will exist, and
you will be able to install it to have a toolset that has a high
probability of being compatible with the kernel you are running on. A
container that needs to be portable between different hosts can install
the metapackage.
3. Create a package that conflicts with linux-tools-common and provides
some arbitrary version of the tools. People who want a toolset that can
run in a container can install that package instead, and bear the
responsibility for what happens if the tools provided don't work with
the kernel that happens to be running.
4. Hook into the alternatives system; allow the user to switch between
packages providing the tools for different kernel versions, with the
default being the dispatch script.
The workaround I am currently using is running this as soon as I get
inside the container, to clobber the wrapper script with whatever actual
binary I have installed:
cp /usr/lib/linux-tools/*/perf /usr/bin/perf
However, this is a pretty terrible hack.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: linux-tools-common 4.15.0-62.69
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-62.69-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-62-generic x86_64
AlsaDevices: Error: command ['ls', '-l', '/dev/snd/'] failed with exit code 2:
ls: cannot access '/dev/snd/': No such file or directory
AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay': 'aplay'
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.7
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord': 'arecord'
AudioDevicesInUse: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'fuser': 'fuser'
CurrentDmesg: Error: command ['dmesg'] failed with exit code 1: dmesg: read
kernel buffer failed: Operation not permitted
Date: Tue Sep 17 19:20:29 2019
Lspci: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lspci': 'lspci'
Lsusb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lsusb': 'lsusb'
MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-890GPA-UD3H
PackageArchitecture: all
PciMultimedia:
ProcEnviron:
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, no user)
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.15.0-62-generic
root=/dev/mapper/hex--vg-root ro splash quiet vt.handoff=1
SourcePackage: linux
UdevDb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'udevadm': 'udevadm'
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 11/24/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc.
dmi.bios.version: FF
dmi.board.name: GA-890GPA-UD3H
dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.board.version: x.x
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrFF:bd11/24/2010:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnGA-890GPA-UD3H:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnGA-890GPA-UD3H:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr:
dmi.product.name: GA-890GPA-UD3H
dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844443
Title:
Version check wrapper scripts for e.g. perf packaged in linux-tools-
common prevent usage in a Docker container e.g. on Kubernetes
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug description:
The `perf` profiling tool, and a few other tools, are part of the
Linux project. Ubuntu gets them from a package specific to the running
kernel version, and uses wrapper scripts installed as e.g.
/usr/bin/perf to dispatch to the appropriate version for the running
kernel. This appears to involve not only checking the actual kernel
version number (e.g. 4.15.0) but also the patch level/build number and
flavor that Ubuntu adds (e.g. 4.15.0-62-generic) if found in the
kernel version.
This is perfectly fine on a real system, where Ubuntu's package
manager is actually in control of the kernel. But Ubuntu is also
fantastically popular as a base for Docker images, and in a Docker
container you have to take your lumps and run on whatever kernel
version the host happens to be using, even if the host isn't using an
official Ubuntu kernel, or running Ubuntu at all.
As currently designed, the linux-tools-common wrapper scripts cannot
work reliably in a Docker environment.
When running in my particular Kubernetes environment (where the host
is some kind of Red Hat Enterprise Linux derivative), this problem
manifests as the following exchange:
root@adamnovak-pod:/vg# perf record ls
WARNING: perf not found for kernel 3.10.0
You may need to install the following packages for this specific kernel:
linux-tools-3.10.0
You may also want to install one of the following packages to keep up to
date:
linux-tools
root@adamnovak-pod:/vg# apt install linux-tools-3.10.0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package linux-tools-3.10.0
E: Couldn't find any package by glob 'linux-tools-3.10.0'
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'linux-tools-3.10.0'
However, the perf binary I happen to have installed, when I get it to
try to run, at least appears to work, despite the kernel version
mismatch. In larger tests, I've gotten perfectly fine profiling data.
root@adamnovak-pod:/vg# /usr/lib/linux-tools/4.15.0-62-generic/perf record ls
bin deps perf.data scripts
[ perf record: Woken up 2 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.002 MB perf.data (10 samples) ]
root@adamnovak-pod:/vg#
So it is not clear that the level of specificity enforced by the
wrapper scripts is actually necessary.
There are a few potential solutions I can see to this problem:
1. Modify the scripts to treat the lack of the exact right tool
version being installed as a warning instead of an error, and have
them select the closest version to run instead.
2. Create linux-tools-3.10.0 ish through linux-tools-5.x.x packages,
containing builds of perf and co. derived from those official mainline
kernels, and a metapackage to install all of them. Then the package
that you get prompted to install when running in a container will
exist, and you will be able to install it to have a toolset that has a
high probability of being compatible with the kernel you are running
on. A container that needs to be portable between different hosts can
install the metapackage.
3. Create a package that conflicts with linux-tools-common and
provides some arbitrary version of the tools. People who want a
toolset that can run in a container can install that package instead,
and bear the responsibility for what happens if the tools provided
don't work with the kernel that happens to be running.
4. Hook into the alternatives system; allow the user to switch between
packages providing the tools for different kernel versions, with the
default being the dispatch script.
The workaround I am currently using is running this as soon as I get
inside the container, to clobber the wrapper script with whatever
actual binary I have installed:
cp /usr/lib/linux-tools/*/perf /usr/bin/perf
However, this is a pretty terrible hack.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: linux-tools-common 4.15.0-62.69
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-62.69-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-62-generic x86_64
AlsaDevices: Error: command ['ls', '-l', '/dev/snd/'] failed with exit code
2: ls: cannot access '/dev/snd/': No such file or directory
AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay': 'aplay'
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.7
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord':
'arecord'
AudioDevicesInUse: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'fuser':
'fuser'
CurrentDmesg: Error: command ['dmesg'] failed with exit code 1: dmesg: read
kernel buffer failed: Operation not permitted
Date: Tue Sep 17 19:20:29 2019
Lspci: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lspci': 'lspci'
Lsusb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lsusb': 'lsusb'
MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-890GPA-UD3H
PackageArchitecture: all
PciMultimedia:
ProcEnviron:
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, no user)
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.15.0-62-generic
root=/dev/mapper/hex--vg-root ro splash quiet vt.handoff=1
SourcePackage: linux
UdevDb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'udevadm': 'udevadm'
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 11/24/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc.
dmi.bios.version: FF
dmi.board.name: GA-890GPA-UD3H
dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.board.version: x.x
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrFF:bd11/24/2010:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnGA-890GPA-UD3H:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnGA-890GPA-UD3H:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr:
dmi.product.name: GA-890GPA-UD3H
dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1844443/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
