** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  Performance is lowered for ARM >= v8.1 cpus by not taking advantage of the 
"Large System Extenstion" atomic instructions they provide.
  
  Note: This config was enabled during xenial development, but was
  disabled to workaround a FTBFS[*] due to us not having a new enough
  binutils to support it. binutils was later updated in xenial, and
  supports these instructions.
  
  [Test Case]
- TBD
+ grep CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS=y /boot/config-$(uname -r)
  
  [Regression Risk]
- There is a known small performance overhead for <= ARMv8.1 arm64 systems 
(noted in the Kconfig).
- [...TBD...]
+ There is a known small performance overhead for < ARMv8.1 arm64 systems 
(noted in the Kconfig). To mitigate the risk of runtime or build failures, this 
should be tested on both ARMv8 and >= ARMv8.1 systems.
  
  [*] https://answers.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-
  team/+archive/ubuntu/unstable/+build/8438034

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  Performance is lowered for ARM >= v8.1 cpus by not taking advantage of the 
"Large System Extenstion" atomic instructions they provide.
  
  Note: This config was enabled during xenial development, but was
  disabled to workaround a FTBFS[*] due to us not having a new enough
  binutils to support it. binutils was later updated in xenial, and
  supports these instructions.
  
  [Test Case]
  grep CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS=y /boot/config-$(uname -r)
  
  [Regression Risk]
- There is a known small performance overhead for < ARMv8.1 arm64 systems 
(noted in the Kconfig). To mitigate the risk of runtime or build failures, this 
should be tested on both ARMv8 and >= ARMv8.1 systems.
+ There is a known small performance overhead for < ARMv8.1 arm64 systems 
(noted in the Kconfig). To mitigate the risk of runtime or build failures, this 
should be tested on both ARMv8 and >= ARMv8.1 systems, to exercise both code 
paths.
  
  [*] https://answers.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-
  team/+archive/ubuntu/unstable/+build/8438034

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691614

Title:
  please enable CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in linux source package in Xenial:
  Incomplete
Status in linux source package in Yakkety:
  Incomplete
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Performance is lowered for ARM >= v8.1 cpus by not taking advantage of the 
"Large System Extenstion" atomic instructions they provide.

  Note: This config was enabled during xenial development, but was
  disabled to workaround a FTBFS[*] due to us not having a new enough
  binutils to support it. binutils was later updated in xenial, and
  supports these instructions.

  [Test Case]
  grep CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS=y /boot/config-$(uname -r)

  [Regression Risk]
  There is a known small performance overhead for < ARMv8.1 arm64 systems 
(noted in the Kconfig). To mitigate the risk of runtime or build failures, this 
should be tested on both ARMv8 and >= ARMv8.1 systems, to exercise both code 
paths.

  [*] https://answers.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-
  team/+archive/ubuntu/unstable/+build/8438034

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1691614/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to