Regression tests completed successfully.

Issues to note:

=== xenial 4.4.0-78.99 - generic ===

* amd64
- monotonic_time: failed on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a 
regression.
- ubuntu_lxc: failed on some systems, not a regression.
- xfstests: fails for btrfs and xfs, passes for ext4. Not a regression.

* arm64
- rtc: failed on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_qrt_apparmor: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_zfs_xfs_generic: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a 
regression.
- hwclock: failed on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests: failed on some systems, not a regression.

* s390x (Ubuntu on LPAR)
- aio_dio_bugs: failed as before, not a regression.
- libhugetlbfs: failed as before, not a regression.
- scrashme: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_blktrace_smoke_test: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_ecryptfs: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_seccomp: build error.

* s390x (zKVM)
- aio_dio_bugs: failed as before, not a regression.
- libhugetlbfs: failed as before, not a regression.
- scrashme: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_blktrace_smoke_test: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_ecryptfs: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_lxc: failed with "too many open files".
- ubuntu_seccomp: build error.

* s390x (zVM)
- aio_dio_bugs: failed as before, not a regression.
- libhugetlbfs: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_fan_smoke_test: failed as before, not a regression.
- scrashme: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_ecryptfs: something failed from .miscdev-bad-count.sh.xfs test all the 
way to namelen.sh.xfs test. This failed before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_lxc: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_seccomp: failed as before, not a regression.

=== xenial 4.4.0-78.99 - lowlatency ===

* amd64
- monotonic_time: fails on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_lxc: fails on some systems, not a regression.
- ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests: some testcases fail, not a regression.
- xfstests: fails for btrfs and xfs, passes for ext4. Not a regression.

** Tags added: regression-testing-passed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1686645

Title:
  linux: 4.4.0-78.99 -proposed tracker

Status in Kernel SRU Workflow:
  In Progress
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow automated-testing series:
  Fix Released
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow certification-testing series:
  In Progress
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package series:
  Fix Released
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-meta series:
  Fix Released
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow prepare-package-signed series:
  Fix Released
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-proposed series:
  Fix Released
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-security series:
  New
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow promote-to-updates series:
  New
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow regression-testing series:
  Fix Released
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow security-signoff series:
  In Progress
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow upload-to-ppa series:
  Invalid
Status in Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing series:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Xenial:
  New

Bug description:
  This bug is for tracking the <version to be filled> upload package.
  This bug will contain status and testing results related to that
  upload.

  For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

  -- swm properties --
  boot-testing-requested: true
  phase: Promoted to proposed
  proposed-announcement-sent: true
  proposed-testing-requested: true

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/1686645/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to