Does the bug also exist in 4.4.0-63.84 or does it just exist in 4.8.0-35? Also, 4.8.0-38 is now in Yakkety -proposed. There are a few SR-IOV commits between -35 and -38. Can you see if -38 still exhibits the bug?
If -38 still has the bug, we can bisect between 4.8.0-34 and 4.8.0-35. That is if -34 did not have the bug. If it does, we would have to test some earlier kernels to know the starting version for the bisect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663354 Title: [Hyper-V] SR-IOV functionality regression in 16.04 HWE proposed Status in linux package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in linux source package in Xenial: In Progress Bug description: Hello, In 1650059 we requested the rebase to the 4.9 kernel LIS commits. Also, from comments #7 and #8 we confirmed that the SR-IOV functionality was working as expected. This was in the test kernel build 4.8.0-33.35. Now, while testing the HWE proposed kernel for Xenial - version 4.8.0-35, we seem to have a regression for SR-IOV. Issues start from the point where the Intel driver is not loaded automatically, then even with manually inserting it, the SR-IOV VF interfaces are not detected. We need to determine if between the test kernel and the proposed one if there have been any other related LIS / SR-IOV commits, or what related ones could have caused this. Thank you! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1663354/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
