> Perhaps it would be nicer if one could create an empty in-memory profile object and populate it with profile_add_relation(), but that is not currently implemented.
I think I did it this way when I hacked my API in back in days of yore and it was nice and clean. I’ll look when I’m at my computer. Chris On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 22:42 Greg Hudson <ghud...@mit.edu> wrote: > On 4/7/22 16:19, Lars Francke wrote: > > We tried to use kadm5_create_principal_3 and kadm5_randkey_principal_3 > but > > we seem to be running into an issue. Ideally we'd like to call this > > function with a handle (+ context) with an in-memory krb5.conf but that > > does not seem to work so we create the files and refer to them in the > > profile but kadmin still seems to load (is this related to the > > "alt_profile"?) a file from a default location which means it'll use the > > wrong connection details. > > krb5_init_context_profile() lets you supply a profile object. If this > is created with profile_init_path(), the application should be able to > strictly control which file is used. > > It is possible to create an in-memory profile with > profile_init_vtable(). Perhaps it would be nicer if one could create an > empty in-memory profile object and populate it with > profile_add_relation(), but that is not currently implemented. > ________________________________________________ > Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos > ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos