Ok, moving this over to the main list... Anybody else have any thoughts on the update below?
Thanks, Chris On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:11 Greg Hudson <ghud...@mit.edu> wrote: > kerberos@mit.edu is better for questions like this. Your plan seems > sound, with the proviso that I'm not an expert on OpenLDAP (or whatever > LDAP server you're using; 389ds also works with krb5, and likely > others). So if there are potential issues with updating the schema, I > wouldn't know about them. The new schema is indeed a superset of the > old one, with optional attributes added. > > On 12/09/2017 10:57 PM, Chris Hecker wrote: > > I need to update my kdc finally to get access to a couple new features, > and > > because duh. > > > > My KDC uses the LDAP backend. > > > > - I was not planning on updating slapd. > > - I was going to back up and everything, of course. > > - I assume I need to copy the latest kerberos.schema over. It looks like > > it's just a superset of the old one. > > > > Is there anything else I need to look out for you guys can think of when > > doing this update? > > > > I have some patches that add minor features I'll have to port once things > > are up and running smoothly, and I'll finally contribute them back like > > promised to this list and Greg 5 years ago. Oops. > > > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > krbdev mailing list krb...@mit.edu > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/krbdev > > > ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
