On 11/03/2015 05:25 AM, Alexander Pánek wrote: > I get that I’m probably not supposed to set this entry to anything but a > valid absolute time, but it would be very helpful if kadmind actually told me > that it’s not valid and also accepts the default value. Basically the error > message tells me the opposite of what kadmind wants. :)
I agree with this conclusion. This seems like a questionable parameter in the first place; how often would an administrator want to set an absolute expiration time for a realm? It seems like a relative time would have made more sense. Regardless, the documentation should not specify a default that doesn't parse, and the error message when it doesn't parse should be specific. > I wanted to create a bug report in Kerberos’ bug tracker, but unfortunately I > don’t have the rights to do so. You can create a bug report by sending mail to krb5-b...@mit.edu. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
