I don't have a definite answer for you, but: 1.7 is very old.
4294967295 is 0xffffffff is -1 as a 32-bit twos-complement integer 255 is 0xff is -1 as an 8-bit twos-complement integer. kvnos are supposed to be unsigned integers, but krb5 prior to 1.10 (and evern moreso prior to 1.6) had bugs where they were treated as signed quantities. -Ben Kaduk On Thu, 28 May 2015, vishal wrote: > Hi, > > I did not get any answer for my query: > > " > Hi, > > I see an issue with kvno with kerberos version 1.7 where linux server is > sending the kvno to trusted domain as 4294967295 while it gets this as 255 > from home domain. > > Is this an known issue? > > Thanks, > Vishal" > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:07 PM, vishal <vicky.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I see an issue with kvno with kerberos version 1.7 where linux server is > > sending the kvno to trusted domain as 4294967295 while it gets this as 255 > > from home domain. > > > > Is this an known issue? > > > > Thanks, > > Vishal > > > ________________________________________________ > Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos > ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
