On 10/29/2014 07:14 PM, Rufe Glick wrote: > Kerberos 5 client side package supplied me with two similar utilities: ktutil > and k5srvutil. I believe that there is no operation that k5srvutil script > does that ktutil can't do. So why do package maintainers keep both of them?
There is no ktutil equivalent for "k5srvutil change", which I believe is the primary reason for k5srvutil to exist. k5srvutil can't do anything that kadmin can't do, since it's just a shell script wrapper around kadmin. But it's easier to run "k5srvutil change" or "k5srvutil delold" than the equivalent kadmin commands. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
