El 11/5/19 a les 21:15, Tobiasz Karoń ha escrit: > > > sob., 11 maj 2019 o 20:03 Jacob Kauffmann <ja...@nerdonthestreet.com <mailto:ja...@nerdonthestreet.com>> napisał(a): > > __ > > On Sat, May 11, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: >> If you want to just "cut the tape" and don't need any effects or >> compositing - Kdenlvie may be acceptable. But not if you want to >> do anything more complex. > > I don't think this is true, and I strongly dislike the implication > that people who use Kdenlive aren't "serious" editors. I've been > using Kdenlive since at least 2012, and over the years, I've done > all kinds of compositing, rotoscoping, color correction, > chroma-keying, and other things with it beyond simply "cutting the > tape." > > Oh no - that's not what I meant. I am pretty serious about making > videos, and I know many people who also use Kdenlive for serious work > What I wanted to say is that doing complex work in Kdenlive is an order > of magnitude harder than doing very simple ones. The software becomes > very flaky, and the user needs to take extra caution and wokraround > problems as their projects complexity grows. That's my experience at least. > > For example - I had so much problems with the Rotoscoping effect that I > just decided to stop trying, becasue it gave me more trouble than gains. > Maybe for some users (on some systems?) they can work reliably, > unfortunately not for me :)
This is my experience too. + Kdenlive project has no releases cycle designed to have really stable versions. p.e. Debian repositories have always a "casual" version that becomes quickly unmaintained, and AppImages an similar downloadables are never LTS versions.
