I faced another bug in position and zoom: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384628
Im only using transform now and converting the custom effects I had with position and zoom On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:21 PM, alberto fuentes <paj...@gmail.com> wrote: > After messing with them a little bit, I have to say transform is > better in almost every way to position and zoom unless im missing > something obvious > > Transform even allows you to put the keyframes relatives to the end, > which allows you to create custom effects for clip endings, allowing > you to reuse your handcrafted effects. Which is a killer feature > > Theres nothing you can do with position and zoom that you cant do with > transform, but theres things you can do with transform that you cant > do with position and zoom (the later even have an imporant bug as > farid pointed out) > > I understand it might be the work of different people and is a mess > from the developer perspective not to include it, but I would prefer > redundancy to be gone from the user perspective. I think "Theres no > wrong way to do it" is bad ui design. Its confusing and make users > think they are different features, which arent obvious unless you try > them all... which is why is bad ui design > > Im not sure yet about transition vs effect. The supposed advantage is > that is more than alpha blend, but transform effect have an > compositing option which controls that... > > Again, I understand completely floss development, and this is a > byproduct of having several authors doing their own thing... which im > very grateful to btw... but somebody should be calling ui design > choices separating the wheat from the chaff to improve kdenlive :) > > Thank you all for your replies! > > > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 11:30 PM, farid abdelnour <snd.no...@gmail.com> wrote: >> hi alberto >> >> 2017-09-10 9:05 GMT-03:00 alberto fuentes <paj...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> How are we supposed to move things on the screen? Are there advantages? >> >> >> i can't really technically say which is better but *for me* position and >> zoom is what works best. >> >> basically +1 to what harald said. >> >> >> >> -- >> 1111.1010.r.i.1101|n.o.i.s.1110|i.m.1010.g.1110|مقاومة >> fsf member #5439 >> usuario GNU/Linux #471966 >> |_|0|_| >> |_|_|0| >> |0|0|0| >> <a href="http://www.gunga.com.br";>gunga</a> >> <a href="http://www.tempoecoarte.com.br";>tempoecoarte</a> >> <a href="http://www.atelier-labs.org";>atelier-labs</a> >> <a href="http://www.mocambos.net";>rede mocambos</a>
