On Thursday 19 December 2002 05:32 am, Jason Wood wrote: > I think that is a good idea. Don't mind me, I got a little caught up with > the idea that we could make a release for xmas :-)
I'd like to see a first usable version very soon too. ;-) > I can add the <render filename="rendered.dv"/> command to KRender in the > next hour or so - it's the only missing link. Ok. > then the sequence that Piave will recieve to render will be : > > <setSceneList> > <!--Scenelist goes here--> > </setSceneList> > <render filename="rendered.dv"/> Ok, but don't send the scenelist if it didn't change since last send. > Good point, I had forgotten to keep that roadmap up to date :-) Once we > have this "0.5" release ready, we'll have to take a look and decide exactly > what kind of features we want in the "1.0" version, and what should be left > for afterwards :-) This roadmap is very usefull, but do you really want to call the first usable release 0.5? As I said I already started a small list with suggestions for the GUI which I'll post soon. Most of those things a trivial, but I wonder if it would be possible to get 'snap-to-frame' for the slider, pretty soon? At least I need a button step-one-frame (bwd,fwd), because with the slider, the smallest I can get is 7 frames. I suggest, that until we have defined the real VEML for container/video- and audiocodes, I just report the FPS next to the duration in the reply to getFileProperties. <reply command="getFileProperties" duration="10.56" fps="25.0" ... > Beeing able to step frame by frame would help me a lot. -- Cheers, Rolf *************************************************************** Rolf Dubitzky e-mail: Rolf.Dubitzky at Physik.TU-Dresden.de s-mail see http://hep.phy.tu-dresden.de/~dubitzky/ ***************************************************************
