On Thursday 28 November 2002 03:19 pm, Jason Wood wrote: > What do you mean by patch level releases? I assumed that this was something > that we do once we have reach our first release and are working ahead for > out superb second release, but don't want to leave our users with buggy > software in the meantime. I don't understand why we would patch an alpha > version of software :-)
;-) > On the compilation issues, I don't have much experience with dealing with > them, but most dependencies are easy to deal with because it is just a case > of installing the correct development packages. yes, I just want to make sure that you know all depending packages beforehand. I _hate_ it when dependency a leads to b leads to c leads to e leads to .... > libxml++ is a different case, since there does not appear to be an RPM > package to install. Perhaps it should be included in Piave CVS until it > (libxml++) get's it's own libxml++-devel package? I can do that. -- Cheers, Rolf *************************************************************** Rolf Dubitzky e-mail: Rolf.Dubitzky at Physik.TU-Dresden.de s-mail see http://hep.phy.tu-dresden.de/~dubitzky/ ***************************************************************
