On Saturday 16 November 2002 08:41 pm, Christian Berger wrote: > Yes, I agree, but specifying the time in seconds would simplyfy > programming a great deal. It'S far easier to parse a simple number than > something like 12:21:12.32, isn't it? We just multiply it by the number of > fps and get the framenumber (currently) or use a more sophisticated > algorithm later.
Oh, now I understand, you don't like the colons! No problem. SO either a long int in milliseconds or a float in seconds. I'm fine with either. Cheers, Rolf *************************************************************** Rolf Dubitzky e-mail: Rolf.Dubitzky at Physik.TU-Dresden.de s-mail see http://hep.phy.tu-dresden.de/~dubitzky/ ***************************************************************
