On Friday 08 November 2002 04:37 pm, Christian Berger wrote: > Am Freitag, 8. November 2002 16:05 schrieben Sie: > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for a more standardised way to do the communication between > > the GUI and Cutter than the one that I threw together to demonstrate > > that things can work. > > > > I'm looking at things such as CORBA, DCOP, etc. at the moment, but my > > experience in this area as a whole is fairly minimal, so does anyone > > else have any suggestions as to which framework to use?
Please keep it simple! I know nothing of DCOP, beside it is based on ICE and that it sounds like KDE dependece. I would not vote for a KDE or Qt dependent solution. I have a little experience with CORBA, (i.e. TAO) on our VxWorks realtime-cluster. If ORBit is really easier (and faster) I would maybe give it a try. I also have some experience with MPI but only from a user's perspective, but there is more to it. It's maybe not the right thing. > How about pipes or fifos they should be enought for that Pipes via NFS can be nasty but as a first step it is not better or worse than the socket we use now, is it? Cheers, Rolf *************************************************************** Rolf Dubitzky e-mail: Rolf.Dubitzky at Physik.TU-Dresden.de s-mail see http://hep.phy.tu-dresden.de/~dubitzky/ ***************************************************************
