On Thursday 07 Nov 2002 8:40 am, Rolf Dubitzky wrote: > It is very common, that people provide a "./bootstrap" script and a > "./clean" script. Ideally after "./clean" everything should look like a new > checkout if you didn't change any code. The ./bootstrap can call clean, and > should then do whatever is need to do to be able to ./configure. Would it > make sense to check in a boostrap script? It would simplify for people > without kdevelop.
I think that's a good idea. > I can compile a fresh check out now without problems in RH7.3. However, a > single include is missing in KMMRulerPanel for gcc 2.96. I took the freedom > to use my developer access to commit this small change, is that ok? Sure, that's fine. Cheers, Jason -- Jason Wood Homepage : www.uchian.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
