On Wednesday 08 January 2003 07:44 pm, Jason Wood wrote: > On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 6:20 pm, Rolf Dubitzky wrote: > > One thing we should keep in mind for the parameters are more complex > > types than "double", obvious would be "color", not so obvious would by > > "point" or "box". If we send just <par "x" "double"> <par "y" "double"> > > kden will not know how to visualize this. > > I think the best way ahead is for you to put together a list of parameter > types that you need to implement piaves current transitions sensibly, and > then in complex cases (such as fonts, colors) we can discuss the exact > implementation details.
ok. > Ok, it's just too easy to get carried away ;-) > > Yes, let's aim for a beta release first. > > > I'll try to fix all known bugs in piave this weekend, and make a list of > > things in kdenlive (e.g. there should be some warning if > > /usr/local/bin/piave does not exist). I think the major things are in > > piave, there are just a few details in kdenlive. > > Here are the problems that I know about : > > Kdenlive : > > * Sometimes when trying to move one clip next to another in kdenlive, there > will be a gap and it won't let you get any closer. I'll look into this, I > suspect it is a rounding error of some sort, but have not looked into it > yet. > > > Piave : > > * Piave does not seem to implement the <render> command at the moment - is > this a possibility for the weekend or is it going to take more time? No, I can try to get it working this weekend. It is definitely a _must_have_ for the first beta. Cheers, Rolf *************************************************************** Rolf Dubitzky e-mail: Rolf.Dubitzky at Physik.TU-Dresden.de s-mail see http://hep.phy.tu-dresden.de/~dubitzky/ ***************************************************************
