On Tuesday 23 March 2004 22:12, Jason Wood wrote: > There was something of a class explosion in Kdenlive when I started > refactoring the timeline to get it to do what I wanted, and using > decorators didn't help quite as much as I hoped :-)
well, I gues you need to make trade off between too many and to few classes. If you plan to keep the code the way it is, you probably need to provide a few lines of documentation for new coders to get started and find their way through this. > I think it can but I would need to look. cool. If you give me some tips which calsses to use and modify I can start and implement it in kdenlive. I'd like to play around with Qt a bit. > Will it actually break communication? I think Kdenlive should just ignore > any incoming VEML commands that it does not understand. I think, I was not aware that you already implemented the <par> <seq> tags in the kdenlive HEAD. Whatever, I'll commit this stuff the next days (need to clean up a bit). Cheers, Rolf -- contacts: http://www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/~dubitzky
