Harry van der Wolf wrote: > I did some tests to compare the standard 0.2.2 version with the 0.2.2 > CVS version (I said SVN in my previous mail: my mistake). I mean the MLT/MLT++ framework here. > > > A.- 0.2.2 stable: Create several slideshows with "default" crossfade, > crossfade with swirl, crossfade with symmetric crossfade. Rendered to > DV-PAL, MPEG4 and MPEG2 => OK. > > B: -0.2.2 CVS: Create several slideshows with "default" crossfade, > crossfade with swirl, crossfade with symmetric crossfade . Rendered to > DV-PAL, MPEG4 and MPEG2 => Problems as mentioned in previous mail. > > C: 0.2.2.CVS: Used project created with 0.2.2 stable libraries and > rendered using 0.2.2 CVS libraries. Rendered to DV-PAL, MPEG4 and > MPEG2 => OK > I typed "symmetric crossfade", but I mean the "symmetric clock" transition. Sorry for being so sloppy in my mails. > > Based on C I think that when creating the clip something is broken in > the CVS libraries. When rendering using a "correct" clip, the result > is also OK. > > regards, > Harry
One last remark. The listbox for LUMA selection is too small. Even when enlarging the window, the listbox doesn't automatically resize and remains too small. kind regards, Harry
