0.8.2.1 makes more sense to me, to indicate a hotfix upgrade. Gabriel
2011/11/7 Evert Vorster <evorster at gmail.com> > On 7 November 2011 02:34, Vincent PINON <vincent.pinon at st.com> wrote: > > Alberto Villa wrote: > >> On Monday 07 November 2011 00:45:10 jb wrote: > >>> Great! At first I wanted to make it 0.8.2.1, but the changes will be > more > >>> important than first thought... with at least 6-7 severe bug fixes. > That's > >>> why I thought 0.8.4 would be more appropriate. > >>> > >>> Anyways, I don't really care about these version's number, so if you > think > >>> 0.8.2.1 is better it's ok for me, as long as I manage to fix these > issues. > >> Not important at all. And your opinion on 0.8.4 makes sense. ;) > > To my opinion 0.8.2.1 would be more appropriate to state that 0.8.2 is > > not perfectly stable, and needs an upgrade without additional features, > > even if code changes are not so light... > > If I wanted to select an "old-stable" release I would take this into > > account. Usually incrementing he "second significant digit" implies new > > features, don't you think ? > > If I can add my 0.2... > > Changing the number of numbers in the release is a pain to handle in > automated scripts for distrobution maintainers. > > Is Kdenlive ever going to get to a 1.0.0 release, or is the leading 0 > going to stay like that forever? > > In my opinion, kdenlive could follow the kernel dev's example, and the > version be bumped to 1.0.0. Then the second significant digit ( 1.x.0 > ) can be used for extra feature releases, and last significant digit ( > 1.0.x ) for bugfix releases. > > In this manner, scripts can automatically pick up when a new release > is available, and the distro maintainer's job is a lot easier. As the > number of numbers in the release does not change. > > -Evert- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20111108/e0e225eb/attachment.html>
