On Jan 29, 2008 3:21 PM, <kdenlive-devel-request at lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Send Kdenlive-devel mailing list submissions to > kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > kdenlive-devel-request at lists.sourceforge.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > kdenlive-devel-owner at lists.sourceforge.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Kdenlive-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: next kdenlive relase (jb) > 2. Re: Big Kdenlive update (jb) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:00:06 +0100 > From: jb <jb at kdenlive.org> > Subject: Re: [Kdenlive-devel] next kdenlive relase > To: For kdenlive developers <kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net> > Message-ID: <200801282200.06640.jb at kdenlive.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Thursday 24 January 2008 12:30:08 Kyle Hotchkiss wrote: > > so... is kdenlive getting any new features/things with kde4? > > I think I will first try to make a 0.6 release of Kdenlive that is still > based > on KDE3. > > The next (0.7) Kdenlive version will be based on KDE4 but won't have many > new > features. I am currently working on it and the main concern is to improve > the > UI to make it nicer and include some nice ideas like dragging a clip's > corner > to crossfade and that kind of small details that are nice to have. But the > KDE4 version means rewriting a lot of code, so the first release will most > likely not have a lot of new features. > > Once the porting will be done, the titler could easily be improved and > include > options like object transparencies. Porting the MLT QImage producer to QT4 > should also allow for new effects like cropping, rotation, etc. > > regards > Jean-Baptiste > > > Seems nice, > Seems like this and kino are the only really good/working video editors for linux > it'd be neat if they could port a decent open source video editor to windows > yea, I know, mlt might be hard to port, etc... > but just saying... > Kyle > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:09:09 +0100 > From: jb <jb at kdenlive.org> > Subject: Re: [Kdenlive-devel] Big Kdenlive update > To: For kdenlive developers <kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net> > Message-ID: <200801282209.09461.jb at kdenlive.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Thursday 24 January 2008 08:59:34 Dan Dennedy wrote: > > > JB, the fix contains massive changes to the way profiles are integrated > > throughout the framework and modules. The impact on kdenlive should be > > little, but it does have trivial interface breakage--just to let you > know. > > I still have to update the mlt++ in my working copy, and I am still > > testing. There are other changes coming as well with one big one that > will > > impact kdenlive... > > Currently the Kdenlive/MLT interface is a really small piece of code, so > it > shouldn't be too hard to update it, and Kdenlive already works with > timecode > instead of frames in most of its parts. > > > I am thinking this change to time representation might be best > integrated > > into the KDE4 port. However, it might be nice to get some of the recent > > fixes into the current codebase for struggling kdenlive (esp. NTSC) > users. > > What do you think? I am trying to coordinate major changes and releases > > between MLT and kdenlive. > > Yes, I think it would be good to release a last KDE3 based Kdenlive that > includes as most fixes as possible. I am ok to work on it so that we could > release a KDE3 based Kdenlive and a new MLT together. > > > Finally, JB, the next MLT commit required changes to inigo and therefore > > would require changes to kdenlive_renderer.c. So, I added a command-line > > option on inigo to make it mimic the behavior of kdenlive_renderer if > you > > want to stop worrying about maintaining it going forward. > > Excellent news. I will happily kill kdenlive_renderer in favor of inigo! > > I?am currently not very present on mailing lists and forums, but it's > mainly > because I spend my time on the KDE4 version, wich is progressing nicely, > so I > am very excited to hear that you are making progress on MLT! > > regards > Jean-Baptiste > > > > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel > > > End of Kdenlive-devel Digest, Vol 20, Issue 9 > ********************************************* > -- ~~ California is nice, ~~ ~~ But California is a lie ~~ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20080129/3a53445f/attachment.html>
