-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125612/#review86755
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


+1 from my side, seems like a nobrainer to me.

- Milian Wolff


On Oct. 12, 2015, 8:10 p.m., Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125612/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 12, 2015, 8:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks, kdewin and David Faure.
> 
> 
> Repository: kservice
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Make doctools optional to avoid needing them just to deploy kservice on 
> win/mac.
> 
> If this is OK for this framework, I would apply the same logic to others, too.
> 
> doctools is all nice, but just for getting the libraries built it is a bit 
> heavy, given nothing of its dependencies ships with Windows.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 90cd5c5 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125612/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make install did still create docs if doctools is around
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Christoph Cullmann
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-windows mailing list
Kde-windows@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-windows

Reply via email to