On Monday, October 5, 2015 8:34:48 PM CEST Marco Martin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Hannah von Reth <vonr...@kde.org> wrote: > > Depending on whether we the themes configurable on Windows we could use > > deskopthemes and icons. > > > > Baloo could be useful. > > Emoticons? > > Maybe Style? > > Phonon, Knotifications. > > In some setups Translations might be useful. > > Maybe some more. > > or could have plasma-desktop a build very very limited on windows? > like everything disabled from cmake except the few kcms?
I think we should not go down this route again. We have been there and saw it was bad. In the end it means turning the primary windowing system we target (X11 and Wayland) optional. We don't have the resources to ensure that such combinations build, less even work. But at the same time it would increase development cost for everybody as we run into weird issues with compile failures, weird runtime bugs due to thinks which should be compiled with X11 not having X11, etc. I agree with what Aleix wrote: if a framework needs a KCM to be useable it needs to be in the framework. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-windows mailing list Kde-windows@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-windows
