Dale posted on Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:24:08 -0600 as excerpted: > Remember my post a while back that said just because I don't respond > doesn't mean I'm not trying? Well, I installed and been testing > krusader for the past few days. I didn't want to post to quick because > I jinxed it last time when I thought Konqueror was working. Anyway, I > switched it so that everything opens with Krusader and so far, > everything works fine. It's not like Konqueror which is what I am used > to but it doesn't slam my CPU either. > > I'm still going to try and get it to look like Konqueror tho. I got to > find the magic button to get the pane on the left tho. lol > > Thanks for the suggestion. Makes me wonder what else is out there tho. > ;-)
Thanks for the followup. "I really otta" try krusader out some time, at least so I can know what I'm talking about when suggesting it as an alternative, even if I don't decide to keep it, but glad it's working for you, regardless. Question, tho: Is it still enough "kde" that it's better for kde than say some gtk-based file manager (say xfce's fileroller or the like, I /think/ fileroller is xfce...)? Because that's the other alternative I had thought about. But I figured krusader is still kde based so should fit in better on a kde desktop even if it is rather different than konqueror's file management mode or dolphin. Did I figure correctly? -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman ___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde-linux mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-linux. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
