https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279316
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Andree <mand...@freebsd.org> ---
Thank you, Daniel, for the initiative.
(In reply to Po-Chuan Hsieh from comment #4)
I find that proposal for consistency useful, but should we make this a generic
"use different test concurrency level" knob and omit the CMAKE_ from the
feature's name in as far as our framework exposes it, and only use it in the
implementation?
I am thinking that the cmake-independent approach could be like:
TEST_JOBS_NUMBER?=${MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER}
or possibly blank or 1 if we find TEST_JOBS_UNSAFE defined or == "yes".
...and then cmake.mk can derive CMAKE_TESTING_PARALLEL_LEVEL from that
${TEST_JOBS_NUMBER}.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
