https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235215
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Victorovich <y...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #5) > So, I don't understand why you insist on using LLVM_DEFAULT in the port when > it breaks if user specifies non-default value via DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=NN. On one hand, ikos wants llvm-config which the base llvm doesn't support. On the other hand, they require that clang corresponds to the llvm version in use. So there should be a llvm/clang version from ports, and LLVM_DEFAULT looks like a reasonable choice. Their upstream is quite responsive and reasonable, so I don't expect that they would introduce some incompatibility with versions that are currently popular. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
