https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199601
--- Comment #85 from Don Lewis <truck...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #49) > This attachment contains a patch to devel/qt4-moc that defines more include > guards so that the Boost 1.60 headers that include the headers moc can't parse > (basically, any header that uses macros in a namespace declaration) are > skipped. I was able to build all ports in > https://wiki.freebsd.org/BoostPortingProject/1.55-to-1.60 that were failing > because of moc without having to patch any of them at all (basically reverting > most of ports r408472, ports r408473, ports r408474, ports r408475, ports > r408502, ports r408773, ports r408419, but also including all ports with a > column saying "fixed by qt4-moc patch"). > > If there's no objection, I'd like to commit it to qt4-moc and remove all > patches added in the revisions above that wrap Boost includes within #ifndef > Q_MOC_RUN blocks. Is there any reason that we shouldn't do an exp-run and commit this before doing the boost upgrade exp-run? That would reduce the number of moving parts for the boost upgrade. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
