On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 23:17:57 +0100 Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Tuesday 14 January 2014 11:20:01 Anton Sayetsky wrote: > > 2014/1/13 Max Brazhnikov <m...@freebsd.org>: > > > I actually like the idea to inform users about other KDE applications, > > but I > don't think bloating port dependencies is appropriate way to do it. > > > How about pkg-message with list of ports for the most popular apps (we > > can > take above-mentioned from KDE site)? > > > > > if you don't know about knemo, how would you know about kdeextragear4? > > > > I'll give you a single answer to above questions. > > I think that the best way is: > > 1. Create meta-port for extragear (someone should find another > > extragear apps in ports tree). > > 2. Add appropriate deps to it. (And remove duplicates from other kde*4 > > ports.) 3. Add kdeextragear4 dep to x11/kde4. > > That sounds like an excellent way to promote the Applications part of KDE -- > there's all the core / base stuff (what's known as the Software Collection > right now) and then there's a wide range of interesting apps that can be > considered part of the "extra's". You might know them by name, or, with this > suggestion, know that the "extragear" port contains a (longish) list of > suitable ports. > > But it'll take some setting up, yeah, and sorting out: is digikam an > extragear? How about tupi (well, that one's totally new still)?
We can create one meta port for extragear apps as KDE community defines it, and second meta port for other third-party KDE applications. > There's a thread on kde-community right now about reconsidering what all are > useful applications (e.g. kfloppy isn't, any more). What is useful and what is not will be decided by users in the end. btw, I never had a chance to use kfloppy :) Cheers, Max _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
