On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:41:08 +0100 you wrote: > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 14:42:33 Max Brazhnikov wrote: > > Actually, I don't any reason why we should keep KDE4_BUILDENV: > > de facto it means USE_LDCONFIG=yes and USE_CMAKE=outsource now. > > The first only pollutes numerous ports, that don't install libraries, the > > second can replace KDE4_BUILDENV in ports Makefiles. > > > > KDE4_VERSION in PLIST_SUB and redefined CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE won't > hunt non KDE > > SC ports. Any objection against removing it? > > Not from me! I just don't get why you say that CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=DebugFull > won't touch non KDE ports...
Right now DebugFull can be used only by KDE SC ports (not by all ports to be precise, since some of them don't use KDE4_BUILDENV), in principle other KDE (KDE, not only KDE SC !) ports could use it. Btw, why do we want DebugFull? isn't Debug enough? We could remove CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE from bsd.kde4.mk at all, since it's already handled by cmake.mk and can be set by user to any value. >From KDE4Internal: # Debug # optimised but debuggable, debugging on (-g) # (-fno-reorder-blocks -fno-schedule-insns -fno-inline) # DebugFull # no optimization, full debugging on (-g3) _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
