On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Max Brazhnikov <m...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 09:51:40 -0500 Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> You need to start to respect the people's work and plan, Doug. Also I >> am part of team that maintaining the bsd.gnome.mk. Yes it will be >> re-add if anyone plan to remove it, because I already have planned add >> the :build/:run feature in the bsd.gnome.mk that the without :* will >> be both build/run time dependency. > > in kde4.mk we support not only run/build suffixes, but also have default > dependence type if suffix is not set. > >> The only thing that I don't plan is to chase thousands of port to have >> the 'pkgconfig;build'. If anyone want to take up this task is cool >> with me. > > Why should we change lots of ports and always keep eyes on new ports, if it > can be altered once in .mk ??
Because it's not a right solution. There are very few need pkg-config in the runtime dependency. Also I already have designed feature that way (it's not for pkg-config, but all stuff in the bsd.gnome.mk) and it doesn't break anything by defaut. But don't worry because bapt, kwm and I have discussed about add USE_PKGCONFIG in the bsd.port.mk and rip pkg-config out of bsd.gnome.mk. It's even better, but I know it's more work like USE_GNOME=pkgconfig:build. Cheers, Mezz > Max -- mezz.free...@gmail.com - m...@freebsd.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gn...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
