On 15 Apr, 2012, at 23:43, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Matthew Rezny <mre...@hexaneinc.com> writes: > >> Index: QT/devel/qmake4/pkg-plist >> =================================================================== >> --- QT/devel/qmake4/pkg-plist (revision 8115) >> +++ QT/devel/qmake4/pkg-plist (working copy) >> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ >> share/qt4/mkspecs/common/aix/qplatformdefs.h >> share/qt4/mkspecs/common/armcc.conf >> share/qt4/mkspecs/common/c89/qplatformdefs.h >> -share/qt4/mkspecs/common/clang.conf >> +share/qt4/mkspecs/common/clang-base.conf >> +share/qt4/mkspecs/common/clang-unix.conf >> share/qt4/mkspecs/common/g++-base.conf >> share/qt4/mkspecs/common/g++-macx.conf >> share/qt4/mkspecs/common/g++-unix.conf > > Are you sure about the line removing clang.conf? It's a valid file which > comes with the tarball.
No, I am not certain of the plist change. Previously, we were copying g++.conf to clang.conf in the Makefile, which I changed to instead copy g++-base.conf and g++-unix.conf to clang-base.conf and clang-unix.conf respectively (which are then patched). Once that worked, I quickly changed the plist to add the two new files and removes the reference to the clang.conf, which I assumed was just the product of the copy in the Makefile. If there is an original clang.conf which was being copied over, then I hadn't noticed it but that needs to be accounted for before committing a change to qmake. _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
