On Monday 24 October 2011 22:40:53 Olivier Smedts wrote: > Are you sure ? I compiled all my qt4 ports with clang except > qt4-webkit because it was failing. So I set up an exception for it in > make.conf, and then it compiled fine (with base gcc).
Ok, I wasn't lucid at all. I wrote that logic not to force Qt to build with only one compiler (there's no single bit oriented onto this), but to make Qt use the correct mkspec for the compiler in use (e.g., Qt configure tests doesn't/didn't support a compiler named c++). If there's no QMAKESPEC for the chosen compiler, the one for the compiler in base (either GCC or Clang) is chosen. Thus, CC and CXX are never passed to Qt configure system, they're just handled by bsd.qt.mk, which will then choose its compiler. To check this, compare the output of $ make -V CONFIGURE_ARGS -C /usr/ports/devel/qt4-corelib $ make -V CONFIGURE_ARGS -C /usr/ports/devel/qt4-corelib CXX=clang++ $ make -V CONFIGURE_ARGS -C /usr/ports/devel/qt4-corelib CXX=distcxx What to do about this? Give me a couple of days to think about it... -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avi...@freebsd.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla Politics -- the gentle art of getting votes from the poor and campaign funds from the rich by promising to protect each from the other. -- Oscar Ameringer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
