On Sunday 19 September 2010 20:10:48 Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:52:03 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Sunday 19 September 2010 07:51:43 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: >>> If everything is working fine with the patch, wouldn't it be nice to >>> upstream it? I remember Tijl sent a merge request for the Qt part >>> (how is it going, by the way?), but I haven't seen the KDE part being >>> sent yet :) >> >> Progress on the Qt part is slow. My patch exposed a bug in the qfsw >> unit test and fixing that exposed bugs in another qfsw backend. Every >> time I update my patch it takes several weeks to get a Qt developer to >> look at it, because this isn't exactly a high profile part of Qt and >> they're busy getting 4.7 out. >> >> I haven't submitted the KDE part yet, because it doesn't work without >> the Qt part. > > We can commit the patches to ports and wait until they will be merged > upstream.
That's ok for me. I'll be here to help if more problems do turn up.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
