on 10/09/2010 10:41 Alberto Villa said the following: > On Friday 10 September 2010 07:38:42 Andriy Gapon wrote: >> If that's what is needed (e.g. process-shared mutexes), then we are > out of >> luck. Adding this feature would require some significant changes in >> supposedly opaque part of pthreads API implementation. And so it is >> unlikely to happen in near future. This has been discussed couple of >> times on freebsd-thre...@. > > and what dou you know about the semaphores i mentioned?
POSIX semaphores are known to work well. See sem(4), sem_open(3). I think that (unnamed) POSIX semaphores in shared memory are successfully used by Firefox and Python. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
