-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:29:26AM -0700, David Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 12 June 2008 01:59:01 am Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > Is the plan to build kdesupport as a regular KDE port or to do each part > > separately? QCA2 is developed in kdesupport and building it from there and > > installing that is compatible with the rest of KDE4. > > If we make a kdesupport port, then it's going to conflict with akode, > akonadi, > decibel, etc. Every other relevant module in kdesupport already exists as a > separate port. Coupled with the message in kdesupport to use a distribution > package, it's a good argument to make QCA2 a separate port. Perhaps a > kdesupport metaport to pull all the others in.
Need we really kdesupport? After 4.4.1 release we don't need this or? qca2 can you find here http://tb.miwibox.org//miwi/qca2.tar.gz (I hope the qca maintainer will update this in next time.) - - Martin > > -- > David Johnson > _______________________________________________ > kde-freebsd mailing list > kde-freebsd@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd > - -- +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ | PGP : 0x05682353 | Jabber : miwi(at)BSDCrew.de | | ICQ : 169139903 | Mail : miwi(at)FreeBSD.org | +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ | Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest! | +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkhVpUUACgkQFwpycAVoI1MycACgmazKKdJGiOEKysMn8Zphm6vF 7XUAoJF59d6pHuIedqXc0FIhnDlOgQop =gpxv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
