kossebau added a comment.
In D16770#569723 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16770#569723>, @dfaure wrote: > Hmmpf, indeed. I forgot about the objection I had here :) > > Are you interested in testing my suggested fix, since you seemed to have a testcase for this code? Been some time, and forgot details, also was using some ftp servers I have no longer access to. Yet I remember is that I preferred the current variant for some reason, but not which, and was collecting enough arguments for a convincing reply, that's why I had not instantly replied then. Perhaps it was something about not trusting QUrl to do the right thing in all cases, but really no more memories. REPOSITORY R241 KIO REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16770 To: kossebau, dfaure Cc: aacid, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
