smithjd added a comment.

  In D16579#428993 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D16579#428993>, @bruns wrote:
  
  > The change, as you pushed it, was never open for review, so there was not 
even the chance to review.
  
  
  Diff 44708 included these changes for review. No one requested changes then, 
and they were ack'ed since: 
https://phabricator.kde.org/D16579?vs=on&id=44708&whitespace=ignore-most#420650 
.
  
  > Hello, the tone of your comment is not appropriate.
  
  You might as well have said, 'the change as you pushed it, fulfilled my 
request for changes, and there was not even a chance to lift it'. That's now 
praise instead of misinformation.
  
  > from the latest comments, it's not clear that their concerns were addressed 
first.
  
  Also misinformation: 
https://phabricator.kde.org/D16579?vs=on&id=44708&whitespace=ignore-most#420650.
 There was also no dissension during the time since this comment was posted and 
the review was closed.
  
  If any subset of review changes were already in principle agreed upon and 
with no requested changes, //AND// the code requested changed is to be removed 
from the final patch, //AND// the changes are binary-only, and the differences 
not rendered on the review ticket:
  
  A) Further review is unnecessary, if only to allow the reviewers to cancel 
their (obsolete) change requests before it is closed;
  B) I'm not aware where it is required that ALL reviewers must cancel their 
requested changes before the review is closed. The review could have been just 
as simply closed without the commit hook and the agreed repository changes made 
without referencing the review in the commit message, of course ignoring the 
fabulous background this review brought before it was turned into an argument 
over why it was closed with 2 reviewers still left to cancel their 
(superfluous) involvement as they see fit.

REPOSITORY
  R286 KFileMetaData

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D16579

To: smithjd, astippich, bruns, mgallien
Cc: ngraham, bruns, astippich, kde-frameworks-devel, #baloo, gennad, domson, 
ashaposhnikov, michaelh, spoorun, abrahams

Reply via email to