ltoscano added a comment.

  In D19557#428619 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D19557#428619>, @ognarb wrote:
  
  > In D19557#428618 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D19557#428618>, @ltoscano 
wrote:
  >
  > > In D19557#428617 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D19557#428617>, @ognarb 
wrote:
  > >
  > > > They use the old link for the image, also the jpg version instead of 
the png. I tested with new page and old page and the result is visually the 
same.
  > >
  > >
  > > But do the existing pages use the old link for the image with the new CSS?
  >
  >
  > Yes the link to the css didn't change, only the content. So even the old 
page links to the new CSS.
  
  
  Ok, so let's back one minute, and maybe it was the case in the original 
review, despite what myself and other people suggested, what if:
  
  - the changes to the XSL files are reverted
  - top-kde.jpg is rewritten using the same size of the original, and of course 
same format. No need to add the new kde.png. You may want to add it, but same 
format, so that we can switch in KF6.
  
  This should ensure no unexpected changes if any user expect the image to be 
that size, and both newly-generated pages and the old ones will have the same 
aspect.
  
  Sorry if it was the case in the first review.
  
  The point about the commit message is still valid.

REPOSITORY
  R238 KDocTools

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D19557

To: ognarb, #vdg, #documentation, yurchor, ltoscano
Cc: yurchor, rooty, ltoscano, bruns, abetts, broulik, aacid, 
kde-frameworks-devel, kde-doc-english, gennad, michaelh, ngraham, skadinna

Reply via email to