dhaumann added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> kjob.cpp:105
>
> + if (isAutoDelete()) {
> + deleteLater();
Alternatively to moving the code, you could also use a `QPointer<KJob>
that(this);` to monitor whether the QObject is still existing. Then, you'd have
to call
if (that && isAutoDelete()) {...}
What I wonder is if calling deleteLater() earlier, would it be possible to
somehow change order of execution?
Reasoning: deleteLater() goes through the event queue, but the signals & slots
as well go through the event queue in case of threaded execution or when using
Qt::QueuedConnection. So this possibly changes the order of events.
Someone who knows the code and how this internally is processed definitely
needs to have a look at this :-)
REPOSITORY
R244 KCoreAddons
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D19170
To: hallas, #frameworks, elvisangelaccio
Cc: dhaumann, kde-frameworks-devel, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
