broulik added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> bruns wrote in icoutils_common.cpp:33 > I think the formula is a little bit to ad-hoc, and actually wrong. > > We have 2 different notable cases. `desiredAspectRatio` obviously is a > constant, this leaves us with `candidateAspectRatio` and `delta` > > 1. all candiates have exactly the same aspect ratio. The difference below is > constant, thus has no influence on the sorting. Sorting is determined by > `delta`alone (good). > 2. candidates have different aspect ratios. Any candidate with a slightly > different aspect ratio is immediately heavily penalized, and thus discarded > (bad). > > Think of e.g. a requested size of 96x96, and two candidates, 32x32 and > 128x64. The small one has a `distance` of 128, while the second one has a > distance 25032. I don't think that's wanted here. I'm open to suggestions … also technically you cannot assume the icon is square REPOSITORY R320 KIO Extras REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D14308 To: broulik, #frameworks, dfaure, ngraham, pali, vonreth, antlarr Cc: bruns