dfaure added a comment.
I cannot confirm that stable_sort is faster, on the contrary. http://www.davidfaure.fr/2018/qsort_performance.cpp updated, says (repeatedly) "std::sort took: 5003 ms" "std::stable_sort took: 7490 ms" Maybe on specific data (the actual filenames you're testing this with), stable_sort ends up being faster, but this isn't true in general (with random data). REPOSITORY R241 KIO REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D10857 To: jtamate, #frameworks, dfaure, markg Cc: markg, apol, michaelh
