sitter added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D6604#124228, @ochurlaud wrote: > At the time I thought about merging it but we would have to re-document everything in doxygen , which would be completely different from what upstream cmake does. > > The ECM page is already linked from the left menu. Does it make sense to have it in frameworks? It's more a prerequisite for the framework no? > > Anyway, a link would work though being suboptimal. The metainfo.yaml is a prerequisite for frameworks I think, yeah. If we could add a property to the yaml `generateApiDox: false` to prevent doxification of ECM that would also work all be it more work I suppose. BUT In a way, I am thinking that for consistency's sake it is actually nicer if ECM is listed alongside the other frameworks on https://api.kde.org/frameworks/index.html even if it then only links to the cmake documentation. It is, at the very least, more discoverable this way. REPOSITORY R240 Extra CMake Modules REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D6604 To: sitter, ochurlaud, dfaure, skelly Cc: #frameworks, #build_system
