----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128811/#review98816 -----------------------------------------------------------
The commit log sounds like you only added a few unittests ("Unit tests of A - and B"). But you actually fixed the behaviour as well, (which I know understand is that the B is about). Reword to what people care for: "fixed foo bar". I love TDD but it shouldn't be reflected in the commit log by describing the tests first ;) src/kdescendantsproxymodel.cpp (line 225) <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128811/#comment66519> (I would call it s_changedRoles so we can see in the code that it's about a static variable, but I can't remember if that's in the coding style) src/kdescendantsproxymodel.cpp (line 235) <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128811/#comment66518> coding style: missing spaces after commas - David Faure On Sept. 1, 2016, 11:15 a.m., Sune Vuorela wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128811/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 1, 2016, 11:15 a.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks, David Faure and Stephen Kelly. > > > Repository: kitemmodels > > > Description > ------- > > Verify that correct signals are emitted when the data related to separators > changes. > > > Diffs > ----- > > autotests/kdescendantsproxymodeltest.cpp 6d7cd35 > src/kdescendantsproxymodel.cpp d3aabf8 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128811/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Sune Vuorela > >