> On May 26, 2016, 10:56 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > Thanks, looks good to me now, please push. > > > > I'm just wondering if the "KF6 TODO" is actually feasible...
> wondering if the "KF6 TODO" is actually feasible Can't comment on that, it's Alex' code, after all. > Note that this requires simple Doxyfile to generate. What about this? This is what my doxyfile looks like: ``` MACRO_EXPANSION = YES EXPAND_ONLY_PREDEF= = YES PREDEFINED= = DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS EXPAND_AS_DEFINED = KSTANDARDACTION_WITH_NEW_STYLE_CONNECT ``` - Gleb ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128011/#review95810 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 26, 2016, 10:25 a.m., Gleb Popov wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128011/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 26, 2016, 10:25 a.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks, Alex Richardson and David Faure. > > > Repository: kconfigwidgets > > > Description > ------- > > This is https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121218/ review brought in shape. I > couldn't update diff there, so created new request. > > What the generated docs looks like can be viewed there: > http://arrowd.name/html/namespace_k_standard_action.html > > Note that this requires simple Doxyfile to generate. How this should be > handled? > > > Diffs > ----- > > autotests/kstandardactiontest.h 0008d28 > autotests/kstandardactiontest.cpp 09ae35d > src/kstandardaction.h d511778 > src/kstandardaction.cpp 216d3d6 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128011/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Gleb Popov > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
