----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/#review95623 -----------------------------------------------------------
I would prefer that we properly investigate each of the cases. E.g. plasma-framework showed that the files are just incorrectly licensed. - Martin Gräßlin On May 19, 2016, 1:50 p.m., Maximiliano Curia wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 19, 2016, 1:50 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark. > > > Repository: khtml > > > Description > ------- > > We are currently shipping an LGPL-2.1 copy in the COPYING.LIB file, but > some parts of the code are under a LGPL-2 only license (see: > autotests/kencodingdetectortest.cpp autotests/kencodingdetectortest.h > src/html/kopenssl.cpp src/html/kopenssl.h src/khtml_printsettings.cpp > src/khtml_printsettings.h src/kmultipart/httpfiltergzip.cpp > src/kmultipart/httpfiltergzip_p.h src/rendering/table_layout.cpp > src/rendering/table_layout.h) and the LGPL license requires shipping the > full text with the source code. > > > Diffs > ----- > > COPYING.LGPL-2 PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127959/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Maximiliano Curia > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
